Three years later after the first men walked on the Moon, the Apollo 16 mission, launched 16 April 1972 ,  landed men on the moon successfully for the fifth time and as the second such ‘J’-Mission to have been executed, again utilised the Lunar Roving Vehicle. This mission also took astronauts to a region of the Moon that had not previously been explored.

Image of John_Young_(Apollo_16)

John Young working by the Lunar Roving Vehicle (Image credit: NASA)

 

The Apollo Program was born after President John F. Kennedy famously declared to Congress in 1961: “landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth” –was to be a major goal for the United States of America. Before the potentially hazardous task of sending humans to the Moon could be attempted however, a number of unmanned experimental missions had to be executed to test the intended spacecraft and to look for possible landing sites on earth’s nearest celestial neighbour. These included the Apollo 2-6 missions. With the launch of the 1966-1968 unmanned Surveyor program, the American unmanned ‘soft landings’ aided the Apollo effort with complete robotic mission rehearsals of actual lunar touchdown. Since President Nixon requested a speechwriter to prepare a condolence speech for use should the first landing astronauts Neil Armstrong and “Buzz” Aldrin become stranded on the Moon however, lunar missions had come a long way.

Of the manned Apollo Moon missions, the term ‘J’-mission referred to longer-stay lunar visits during which a greater number of scientific experiments could be undertaken. Apollo 15 was the first mission of this type, with astronauts remaining on the Moon for just over 2 days. Although the Apollo 16 overall mission duration was 11 days (i.e. 256 hours in space), this ‘J’-Mission’s actual stay on the Moon lasted 71 hours 2 mins.

The landing site selected was the Descartes Highlands region,  a mountainous area west of the ‘Nectaris Sea’ or Mare Nectaris. Although the Alphonsus crater was also initially considered as a possible landing site for the Apollo 16 mission, the Moon’s hilly region around the Descartes crater was finally selected. The highlands were chosen for the landing craft because this terrain had yet to be explored by any of the Apollo missions to date. The final incentive in visiting the Descartes was provided with the prospect of gathering rock and surface samples thus far unstudied, and of which type the majority of the rest of the Moon’s surface was thought to be composed.

Image of Apollo_16_crew

Apollo 16 mission crew from left to right: Thomas K. Mattingly II; John W. Young; and Charles M. Duke Jr. (Image credit: NASA)

 

All American pilot astronauts, the primary crew were: John Watts Young, mission commander; Thomas Kenneth Mattingly II, as Command Module pilot; Charles Moss Duke Jr, as Lunar Module pilot. The backup crew were: Fred Wallace ‘Pecky’ Haise Jr (commander); Edgar Dean Mitchell (Lunar Module pilot); Stuart Allen Roosa (Command Module pilot).

Young was lead pilot of the Apollo 16 spacecraft and was responsible for ensuring overall completion of the mission. Mattingly was responsible for piloting the CM 113 lunar spacecraft in orbit around the Moon, all the while carrying out extensive geochemical and photographic mapping around the lunar equator. Duke assisted Young with the flight and landing of LM-11 as well as extra-vehicular activities in and around the landing site.

John W. Young operated a flight computer on Gemini 3 in March 1965, was commander on Gemini 10, and was Command Module pilot of the Apollo 10 Mission.  He was also on the backup space flight crews of Gemini 6, the second Apollo mission and Apollo 7. Thomas K. Mattingly II served on the Apollo 8 and 11 astronaut support crews, was involved in the development and testing of the Apollo spacesuit and backpacks and was the originally selected Command Module pilot for the Apollo 13 flight. Charles M. Duke Jr was a support crew member for the Apollo 10 mission. He was CAPCOM for Apollo 11, and on Apollo 13 he served as backup Lunar Module pilot.

Apollo 16 and its crew were launched from Pad 39A into space in the huge Saturn V SA-511 rocket at the Kennedy Space Centeron on 16April 1972. CSM 113 Casper was the name of the Command (Service) Module on the Apollo 16 mission. LM-11  Orion was the name of the Lunar Module that landed the two landing-astronauts, Duke and Young, on the Moon. The Command Module also housed the scientific instrument module (SIM) bay where inflight experiments were carried out.

During the coast to the Moon a light-coloured jet was observed coming from the Lunar Module. A subsequent investigation however identified it to only be white particles of shredded thermal paint. The S-IVB stage was found to have a propulsion system leak which produced an unpredictable thrust. This prohibited a concluding targeting manoeuver after it was separated from the CSM. Ultimately this failure resulted in the stage not reaching its intended target location on the Moon. Contact was lost with the instrument by 4:04pm EST on 17 April. Seismometers left on the Moon from previous Apollo missions eventually detected its crash impact 260km northeast of the arranged target point at 4:02pm 19 April. On entering a lunar orbit and after Orion’s attempted separation from Casper, a propulsion irregularity was discovered. Spacecraft separation was delayed 5 3/4hrs until test analyses revealed the system was still safe to use if required.

 

The Command Service Module Casper in orbit around the Moon seen from the LM’s docking window. (Image credit: NASA)

 

With an astronaut steering the Lunar Roving Vehicle or LRV, two main terrains were traversed within the lunar highlands. The first was the Cayley Plains, a geological formation which had smooth undulations. The second and the most uneven lunar surface ever to be driven over, was the furrowed highland plateau of  Descartes. In total, the Apollo 16 Rover covered 27 kilometres (16.6 miles) of lunar terrain.

image of family photo on moon

The Duke Family on the Moon (Image credit: Charles Duke/NASA)

 

Astronaut Charles Duke’s personal response to the lunar visit was to leave a family photograph in a plastic cover on the Moon’s surface. In response to the accusations that the Apollo landings were a fake, Duke is known for having rebuffed such notions by saying: “We’ve been to the Moon nine times. Why would we fake it nine times, if we faked it?”

 

Image of Charles Duke at plum-crater

On the rim of the 40m deep Plum crater: Charles M. Duke Jr, Apollo 16 Lunar Module pilot engaged in collecting lunar sample during first EVA. (Image credit: NASA/John Young)

 

After landing LM-11 Orion on the Moon’s Cayley Plains, Duke and Young commenced three Extra-Vehicular Activities or EVA excursions. They explored lunar features and collected a total of 95.8kg of surface material samples. They also set up and put in motion a number of automated experiments on the lunar surface that would continue to send data after Young, Mattingly and Duke had returned to Earth. On the Moon’s surface astronaut Young tripped over and broke a cable to some heat-flow sensors effectively disabling a lunar experiment. On-board, the crew: took photographs while their spacecraft orbited the Moon; carried out further ‘inflight’ experiments; conducted electrophoresis experiments requiring micro-gravity; completed engineering evaluations of spacecraft and equipment.

 

Image of apollo 16 UFO sighting

A UFO? Although the bright corner shapes are only window reflections, a flying saucer-like object was captured on a few seconds of film above the Moon as the Apollo 16 crew were commencing their flight home on the Command Module. (Image credit: NASA)

 

Appearing to be a saucer shape with a dome on top, an UFO above the Moon received no less interest than the attention of an entire analysis team back at NASA when Apollo 16 was complete. Verdict: the mysterious object that briefly swung into the field of view was discovered to be none other than a floodlight jutting out on the end of a boom from the bottom of the crew’s own Command Module.

 

image of apollo 16 liftoff

With Duke and Young onboard, the Ascent Module blasts off throwing debris everywhere. (Image credit: NASA)

 

Image of apollo-16-ascent stage

Apollo 16’s Ascent stage looks a bit the worst for wear during its rendezvous with the CSM (Image credit: NASA)

 

Orion commenced lunar lift-off at 8:26pm EST on 23 April, and docked with the CSM as it continued to orbit the Moon. The landing astronauts transferred themselves, equipment, film, and lunar samples to the Command Module before jettisoning Orion the next day. Just before the concluding phase of the Apollo 16 mission commenced, a faulty engine was discovered on the CM-113 spacecraft. The crew took it around the far side of the Moon and to everyone’s relief succeeded in firing it. After re-establishing radio contact with Earth, Young and Mattingly set Casper on a course for home. Mattingly ventured out of the Command Module while it was in its trans-earth coast to collect tapes from the panoramic and mapping cameras in Casper’s SIM-bay. The 1hr 13min Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) put this aspect of the Apollo 16 mission into the record books. Apart from an initial engine glitch, the Apollo 16 journey home ran smoothly and without incident. ‘Splashdown’ was in the Pacific Ocean, north of Christmas Island at 1945 (Universal Time/GMT) 27 April 1972. Young, Mattingly and Duke were picked up by the USS Ticonderoga.

 

Apollo 16 patch: the yellow chevron is a design element borrowed from the NASA insignia, which itself was derived from the official NASA seal designed in 1959. The chevron itself is based on a windtunnel model of a high-speed bomber concept (and not a lot of people know that!) (Image credit: NASA)

 

In 1981 Young flew into space for the fifth time as commander of the first space shuttle mission, STS-1 and so became the only astronaut who would have flown Gemini, Apollo and Shuttle spacecraft. In 1983 he was again placed in the command seat of the first Spacelab mission, STS-9 and was on the backup crew of Apollo 17. Between the years 1974 and 2004 Young served as: Chief of the Astronaut Office, Special Assistant to the Director for Engineering, Operations, and Safety of the Johnson Space Centre; Associate Director (Technical). After a long and distinguished career at the helm of mankind’s exploration of space and having set a space speed record for flying at 11 107 metres per second, Young retired from NASA in 2004. From 1973 Mattingly fulfilled a number of roles within the astronaut office before becoming head of Astronaut Office DOD Support Group in 1983. He was appointed backup commander for the second and third test flights of the Columbia shuttle STS-2 and STS-3, and was spacecraft commander for the final orbital test flight of the Space Shuttle Columbia (STS-4) in 1982. In 1985 Mattingly was commander of the STS-51C Discovery. He resigned from NASA the same year and served as Chief of US Navy Space Command (NAVSPACECOM) before retiring at the rank of Rear Admiral, U.S.N. in 1986. Mattingly became Director of Utilization and Operations at Grumman Space Station Office and then of the X-33 program with Lockheed-Martin. Admiral Mattingly was also Chairman of Universal Space Network, Universal Space Lines, Inc. until 1999 and subsequently headed the Atlas booster program for General Dynamics, Inc. in California. Duke again fulfilled the role of lunar module backup pilot for the Apollo 17 mission. In 1975 he retired from the astronaut program to pursue private business. He owns Duke Investments, is President of Charlie Duke Enterprises and Duke Ministry for Christ. He is an active speaker, Christian lay witness and is chairman of the board of directors of the Astronaut Scholarship Foundation.

Bar one, the 11 day Apollo 16 space mission was the final mission to land men on the Moon but the first to land in the lunar highlands. Likewise it was the first Apollo mission to see an ultraviolet camera or spectrograph used on the Moon, this ‘J’-Mission succeeded in its objective, attaining surface samples that completed a large part of man’s exploratory lunar jigsaw. Apollo 16 is notable for: having placed the heaviest total spacecraft load in lunar orbit, 34 522kg; having driven the Lunar Rover over the roughest terrain discovered on the Moon; the longest space activity (Extra-Vehicular Activity) by an astronaut outside a Command Module while the spacecraft was on its return flight to Earth; first Cosmic Ray Detector deployed on Moon and to use the Moon as an astronomical observatory.

 

Image of lro_apollo16_view

The landing site imaged recently by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The RTG is a radioisotope thermoelectric generator used to power the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP). (Image credit: NASA)

 

The next mission would be Apollo 17, the final planned mission to land men on the Moon followed a pause in lunar exploration for a few years (or so everyone at the time thought) .

(Article by Nick Parke, Education Support Officer)

 

 


Apollo 16: Nothing So Hidden… from NASA Lunar Science Institute on Vimeo.

 

CORRECTION: This article originally included an image of Apollo 15’s CSM rather than Apollo 16’s. The article has been corrected.

 


22 Comments

semaj · March 5, 2016 at 21:43

Current NASA emblem has the serpents tongue across it so its not just Apollo 16. Just saying but I guess my research has failed again!

    admin · March 7, 2016 at 09:32

    Dear Semaj, yes, I am afraid you have again failed to read the answers or sources you have requested.

semaj · March 5, 2016 at 21:40

A flag is an emblem, boy you do like to split hairs.

    admin · March 7, 2016 at 09:04

    Dear Semaj, but an emblem is not a flag.

    I try to be accurate, as an engineer and someone who seeks the truth (as you have told me you are), I would thought that you would have appreciated my efforts.

semaj · March 4, 2016 at 11:55

Some answers would be good, anybody??
The yellow chevron on the NASA flag is a serpents tongue. Not a lot of people know that!

    admin · March 4, 2016 at 12:43

    Dear Semaj, once again I think that there may have a research failure on your part. I assume that by “NASA flag” you mean the Apollo 16 emblem in one of the images. You can read what it really depicts in the words of one of its designers at this link.

    You can read about the red shape in the NASA logo in the article at this link, there are even photos of the wing design model which inspired it.

    I hope this helps you.

semaj · February 6, 2016 at 20:40

Charles Duke said we have been to the moon 9 times why would we fake it! Please tell us when the other 3 took place? Was the family photo just thrown across the surface as there are no footprints visible which would have made it far more personal to the people involved?

    admin · March 4, 2016 at 12:48

    Dear Semaj, Apollo 8, 10 to 17 add up to 9 missions.

    I believe Duke dropped the photograph into position.

    I hope this helps you.

semaj · February 6, 2016 at 20:31

Who took the picture of the CSM Casper?

    admin · February 8, 2016 at 08:41

    Dear Semaj, thanks for your question. The picture was taken by either John Young or Charles Duke (since Kenneth Mattingly was on board Casper). I hope this has helped you.

      semaj · March 4, 2016 at 12:18

      So from the LEM’s tiny windows? Why would the LEM be at a higher altitude? Why is the SIM bay open, was someone on a spacewalk as that would be its only access by the look of it? If it could be accessed internally why would the door be open, oh and where is the door?

        admin · March 4, 2016 at 13:24

        Dear Semaj, briefly, the LM’s windows are not tiny (25 by 24 by 28 inches). The LM and CSM were only few metres apart when the picture was taken so I do not understand why you see a problem with this image. The SIM bay door was jettisoned (rather than opened) a few hours before the spacecraft entered lunar orbit. As discussed in the article you are commenting on, the only access to the bay was by performing a space walk, this was done (to collect film from a camera) on the Apollo missions.

        You can read about the Apollo 15 SIM bay (which was identical to Apollo 16’s) in the document at this link.

        I hope this has helped you.

          semaj · December 13, 2016 at 11:22

          Sorry, why would the LEM be above the CSM? How did they get into the LEM from the CSM and vice versa as the docking attachment is in the way as shown in the image in this article? Please do not refer to any other images, just this one. The lighting from the picture of the CSM should surely show a shadow or part shadow of the LEM on it, shouldn’t it?

            admin · December 13, 2016 at 15:34

            Dear Semaj, thank you for your questions.

            why would the LEM be above the CSM?

            I do not know what you are asking here. Why could it not be?

            How did they get into the LEM from the CSM and vice versa as the docking attachment is in the way as shown in the image in this article?

            I will refer you to my response to Question 10 in the article 15 Questions about the Moon Landings (link) (written in response to your first set of questions). This includes links to technical descriptions of the docking mechanism and how it operated.

            The lighting from the picture of the CSM should surely show a shadow or part shadow of the LEM on it, shouldn’t it?

            No, I disagree. Look at the shadows of the RCS nozzles which run along the Service Module indicating that the Sun’s light is coming from the rear quarter not obliquely which is what I think you are suggesting. Note also that the Command Module is completely in the shade. For completeness the image in question is an enlarged and cropped version of the one at this link.

            However, answering this query has led me to realise that I used the wrong picture (of Apollo 15’s CSM rather than Apollo 16’s). To correct this I have moved the image in question to the Apollo 15 article (link) and I have replaced it with an image of Apollo 16’s CSM. Apologies for the confusion.

b · April 7, 2015 at 06:46

the family photo part r fake educated yourself people, back thn the photo are no color. moon day time average temp are 253 Fahrenheit (frm movie)

    admin · April 9, 2015 at 07:58

    Dear B, thanks for your comments. I am afraid that I find some of them hard to understand.

    back thn the photo are no color.

    Are you saying that you do not believe colour photography existed in 1972?

    moon day time average temp are 253 Fahrenheit (frm movie)

    But what was the temperature of the surface early in the morning when the photo was taken? For that matter what if it was 253 deg F (123 deg C)? what difference would that have made?

nick deakin · April 29, 2012 at 23:04

I always think its the great photography that brought the lunar landing missions to life, particularly the inclusion of the astronauts.With 40 years now gone since the early moonlandings it will be sad indeed if we do not return within the next forty. Robotic missions to Mars are a technological achievement but it will be the arrival of astronauts there that will refire our collective imaginations.

Tom Ruba · April 9, 2012 at 08:11

Thanks for this great summary inclusive great pictures. Did not know the “UFO incident” yet.
Another interesting aspect of Apollo 16 is “A16 was to experience more technical problems than almost any other mission. The final success of Apollo 16 was due almost entirely to the skills, knowledge, and experience of both the flight crew and of the many people who supported it from the ground. In the history of manned spaceflight, Apollo 16 comes only narrowly behind Apollo 13 and Skylab 2 as an example of how a manned space mission can successfully overcome adversity.”
Source: http://history.nasa.gov/ap16fj/a16summary.htm

Stay tuned for Apollo 16 highlights on my Twitter channel http://twitter.com/apollo_history

    Nick Parke · April 16, 2012 at 15:59

    Tom, many thanks for your comment. I always think that any human departure, survival, and return to Earth’s atmosphere is remarkable. As you say, that final engine failure on the command ship before Apollo 16 returned home must have been a real nerve-wracker!

Is the Moon Hollow? | Astronotes · May 22, 2015 at 15:44

[…] activities on the moon. These seismometers, which were set up during the Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15 and 16 missions, radioed back information to the Earth until they were finally switched off (to save […]

5 Goofy Moonlanding Hoax Theories | Astronotes · January 5, 2015 at 12:55

[…] marked in this manner? The image in question is cropped from a much larger image taken during the Apollo 16 mission. In the original image, the rock is clearly visible but no “C” can be seen. In fact the […]

Image of the Month: Lindsay Crater | Astronotes · October 15, 2013 at 03:08

[…] passed, intelligent life arose on Earth and gave the crater a name, Dollond-C.Then  in 1972 Apollo 16 landed about 100km to the crater’s southeast  but that is as close as life as ever come to it. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.